How can 19th-century art and literature be still copyrighted?
Retro Tape
Fancy RavenJust figured I could explain that a little, I'm not an expert but I've been dealing with copyrights in the past: So the art itself is not copyrighted, however the digital copy of the art can be and in your case is. Photographer took the picture, cleaned it up digitally and published, so they hold the copyright to that specific picture of art that is in public domain.
I hope that makes sense :) nice quiz though!
Fancy Ravenauthor
Retro TapeThe images have been taken from open sources like Wikipedia under free licenses.
And it is stated underneath that while painting is public domain, that specific photo of it is under license that allows you to use it IF you leave attribution.
Big Pugjudge
This test may have a higher chance of receiving a reward. Nominated for:
Educational explanations. 👍 Explanations cover why the correct answers are correct. E.g.: #q29, #q30, #q18 etc
Stone Squid
Excellent quiz! Very infromative and truly educational :)
So the art itself is not copyrighted, however the digital copy of the art can be and in your case is. Photographer took the picture, cleaned it up digitally and published, so they hold the copyright to that specific picture of art that is in public domain.
I hope that makes sense :) nice quiz though!
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/File:Balzac_G%C3%A9rard-S%C3%A9guin.jpg
And it is stated underneath that while painting is public domain, that specific photo of it is under license that allows you to use it IF you leave attribution.
Educational explanations. 👍 Explanations cover why the correct answers are correct.
E.g.: #q29, #q30, #q18 etc