Thank you for taking the effort to submit your Quiz for the contest. Unfortunately, this Quiz will not be able to receive a prize: Missing explanations. More than 10 explanations simply repeat the correct answer and use the same reason - "Ricorda che la probabilità si calcola "casi_favorevoli / casi_possibili". E.g.: #q1 #q2 #q3 #q4 #q5 #q6 #q7 #q8 #q10 #q11 etc.
Stout Squirrel작성자
Actually, the test involve basic concepts, for which the only explanation of the correct answer is the way you calculate the probability: favorable cases / total cases. In every question i explained that the student should use this concept to find the answer ("remember that...") and then highlighted the result of the ratio of that particular case (e.g. "in this case the result is 13/52" for #q1). Why this is not a correct way to explain the (possible) mistake? :)
Tall Panda심사위원
Stout SquirrelThis Quiz was fully re-assessed by an independent Judge.
Unfortunately, this Quiz will not be able to receive a prize:
Missing explanations. More than 10 explanations simply repeat
the correct answer and use the same reason - "Ricorda che la probabilità si calcola "casi_favorevoli / casi_possibili". E.g.:
#q1
#q2
#q3
#q4
#q5
#q6
#q7
#q8
#q10
#q11
etc.
Why this is not a correct way to explain the (possible) mistake? :)
The original verdict was confirmed to be correct.