wenn jemand drauf steht, wieso nicht ... zu vielen Aufgaben für mich, 0,30sek ist viel zu wenig
Crazy Butterfly
I will give this quiz only one star, for a multitude of reasons: The explanation feels cheated (links to an english website with step by step solution, and not proper german. At least take the time and type it out there). The questions/answers take almost no time to create at all, I would feel bad giving this anything higher in comparison to the other tests where people put time and hard work into. And thirdly, most important reason: You tried to cheat the system! Instead of creating three tests (easy, medium, hard) with all questions and answers, you created at least 12. A query to see all of them is this one: https://quiz.directory/?query=&lang=de&level=&query=lineare.
I will link to this comment from all the other ones
Wise Flyauthor
I respect your opinion and your effort to seek and destroy but I got something to say too.
> The questions/answers take almost no time to create at all, I would feel bad giving this anything higher in comparison to the other tests where people put time and hard work into I worked hard for THREE weeks to create my quizzes, I created my images, I wrote the descriptions and explanations.
> You tried to cheat the system! Instead of creating three tests (easy, medium, hard) with all questions and answers, you created at least 12 This is an hash accusation! Cheating means disobeying the rules which I have respected, let's read from https://telegram.org/blog/400-million#400k-for-creators-of-educational-tests "publish an original educational test on any subject at any difficulty level, in any language ... and add any media you require to your questions, but make sure all intellectual property rights are respected". I spit the test in multiple ones because more than 15 questions are unbearable even for me, but to participate I had to get to 30.
I can clearly see that my quizzes are different for the majority of others because I structured them as exercises where others are more trivia quizzes. But the rules allows them.
> The explanation feels cheated (links to an english website with step by step solution, and not proper german I would be ore than happy to insert a German calculator but I couldn't find it so I stuck with the English one. I'm ok to be penalized for this.
I have to add one more thing about the "you split the quiz, this is not valid" in the @contests group someone asked if we could split the test in multiple ones and an admin responded to use our brains.
Crazy Butterfly
Wise Fly> I respect your opinion and your effort to seek and destroy
Thank you, it was indeed quite an effort.
> The questions/answers take almost no time to create at all, I would feel bad giving this anything higher in comparison to the other tests where people put time and hard work into I worked hard for THREE weeks to create my quizzes, I created my images, I wrote the descriptions and explanations.
Okay. I'm not saying I am not believing you, but I feel like I could have created a bot in a day which produces these quizzes. What I rather want to say: IF (big if) you actually spend three weeks on these - why? You could have spend three weeks on two or three quality quizzes in your native tongue. Instead you decided to do these, copy pasting the images, descriptions and explanations once you created them around in several quizzes in one language, then put them in others. As one other comment somewhere pointed out, you didn't even put the time in to translate the letters to standard German ones. Also, remember, so far I was still giving you two stars.
> This is an hash accusation!
If I don't do accusations I would get nothing done here
> Cheating means disobeying the rules which I have respected, let's read from https://telegram.org/blog/400-million#400k-for-creators-of-educational-tests "publish an original educational test on any subject at any difficulty level, in any language ... and add any media you require to your questions, but make sure all intellectual property rights are respected".
Okay so now we can argue on how original math is (cause its freaking not) or how original a quiz is when you upload it three times, just adding numbers to the title (cause that is also freaking not original), but I would love for you to think about the whole situation for a moment. Imagine you are telegram, a big company, which is still fun at its heart (sometimes at least). They decide to open up a competition for people to upload their original, educational quizzes on their. Now try to imagine what they really want to see as winners. 12 quizzes, being basically the same math questions, all over again and again? Is that an original quiz? I say no. One quiz for each math topic, fine. But not several for the same! Telegram themselves is a lot about thinking by yourself, what they/their users want. I am not saying they told you to do that (because they never do), all I am saying I'm surprised when the judges come to a different conclusion
> I spit the test in multiple ones because more than 15 questions are unbearable even for me, but to participate I had to get to 30.
Now this is the first time I am actually going to swear here, but this is bullshit! This is not about you, this is about every single other participant in this contest. I do not care how unbearable this is for you, you do not have to take the quiz. You have to compare your situation with other people who took three weeks to create one original contest about eggs, for example, spending an hour in their busy day every day to create (and I mean really create, paint from nothing to finish) pieces of art to accommodate their questions, thinking of egg puns to easen the blow when you didn't know the answer. I am not saying you should have done this, I know I personally would not be able to. All I am saying that it is definitely an unfair situation, when you upload the same topic in different quizzes, especially for the egg guy.
> I can clearly see that my quizzes are different for the majority of others because I structured them as exercises where others are more trivia quizzes. But the rules allows them.
I am not saying your quizzes are wrong, I never did that. I am giving you 2 stars because of bad german, bad explanation etc. As I pointed out. I give you one star because you, in my eyes, tried to cheat and get more wins then you should have gotten, if any at all.
Crazy Butterfly
Crazy Butterfly> The explanation feels cheated (links to an english website with step by step solution, and not proper german I would be ore than happy to insert a German calculator but I couldn't find it so I stuck with the English one. I'm ok to be penalized for this.
But. Why not write the solution directly in the explanation? Like every other good quiz does? If you would have written the step by step way in there and then link somewhere else, I would have been fine with it.
> I have to add one more thing about the "you split the quiz, this is not valid" in the @contests group someone asked if we could split the test in multiple ones and an admin responded to use our brains.
Two points: The admins in this group are not judges or have anything at all to do with this contest. In fact, let me, an admin in this group, right now write that you should use your brains: https://t.me/contests/101591. Tada. Secondly, I dont think you got the message, because if you would have used your brain, you could have gotten to the conclusion that splitting a quiz is indeed unfair to other participants. As I hopefully made clear by now.
*drops mic*
Wise Flyauthor
Crazy ButterflyI see your points but I just want to add one more thing to the whole discussion that is important in the evaluation process: 200 characters limit in the explanation is just not acceptable for a complete explanation moreover you could not format in MathML or any other math formatting
Crazy Butterfly
Wise FlyI mean, if you really wanted to put elbow grease in (and would have complained in the group about it), I would have pointed you to telegra.ph.
I will link to this comment from all the other ones
> The questions/answers take almost no time to create at all, I would feel
bad giving this anything higher in comparison to the other tests where
people put time and hard work into
I worked hard for THREE weeks to create my quizzes, I created my images, I wrote the descriptions and explanations.
> You tried to cheat the system! Instead of creating three tests (easy,
medium, hard) with all questions and answers, you created at least 12
This is an hash accusation! Cheating means disobeying the rules which I have respected, let's read from https://telegram.org/blog/400-million#400k-for-creators-of-educational-tests "publish an original educational test on any subject at any difficulty level, in any language ... and add any media you require to your questions, but make sure all intellectual property rights are respected".
I spit the test in multiple ones because more than 15 questions are unbearable even for me, but to participate I had to get to 30.
I can clearly see that my quizzes are different for the majority of others because I structured them as exercises where others are more trivia quizzes. But the rules allows them.
> The explanation feels cheated (links to an english website with step by step solution, and not proper german
I would be ore than happy to insert a German calculator but I couldn't find it so I stuck with the English one. I'm ok to be penalized for this.
I have to add one more thing about the "you split the quiz, this is not valid" in the @contests group someone asked if we could split the test in multiple ones and an admin responded to use our brains.
Thank you, it was indeed quite an effort.
> The questions/answers take almost no time to create at all, I would feel bad giving this anything higher in comparison to the other tests where people put time and hard work into
I worked hard for THREE weeks to create my quizzes, I created my images, I wrote the descriptions and explanations.
Okay. I'm not saying I am not believing you, but I feel like I could have created a bot in a day which produces these quizzes. What I rather want to say: IF (big if) you actually spend three weeks on these - why? You could have spend three weeks on two or three quality quizzes in your native tongue. Instead you decided to do these, copy pasting the images, descriptions and explanations once you created them around in several quizzes in one language, then put them in others. As one other comment somewhere pointed out, you didn't even put the time in to translate the letters to standard German ones. Also, remember, so far I was still giving you two stars.
> This is an hash accusation!
If I don't do accusations I would get nothing done here
> Cheating means disobeying the rules which I have respected, let's read from https://telegram.org/blog/400-million#400k-for-creators-of-educational-tests "publish an original educational test on any subject at any difficulty level, in any language ... and add any media you require to your questions, but make sure all intellectual property rights are respected".
Okay so now we can argue on how original math is (cause its freaking not) or how original a quiz is when you upload it three times, just adding numbers to the title (cause that is also freaking not original), but I would love for you to think about the whole situation for a moment. Imagine you are telegram, a big company, which is still fun at its heart (sometimes at least). They decide to open up a competition for people to upload their original, educational quizzes on their. Now try to imagine what they really want to see as winners. 12 quizzes, being basically the same math questions, all over again and again? Is that an original quiz? I say no. One quiz for each math topic, fine. But not several for the same! Telegram themselves is a lot about thinking by yourself, what they/their users want. I am not saying they told you to do that (because they never do), all I am saying I'm surprised when the judges come to a different conclusion
> I spit the test in multiple ones because more than 15 questions are unbearable even for me, but to participate I had to get to 30.
Now this is the first time I am actually going to swear here, but this is bullshit! This is not about you, this is about every single other participant in this contest. I do not care how unbearable this is for you, you do not have to take the quiz. You have to compare your situation with other people who took three weeks to create one original contest about eggs, for example, spending an hour in their busy day every day to create (and I mean really create, paint from nothing to finish) pieces of art to accommodate their questions, thinking of egg puns to easen the blow when you didn't know the answer. I am not saying you should have done this, I know I personally would not be able to. All I am saying that it is definitely an unfair situation, when you upload the same topic in different quizzes, especially for the egg guy.
> I can clearly see that my quizzes are different for the majority of others because I structured them as exercises where others are more trivia quizzes. But the rules allows them.
I am not saying your quizzes are wrong, I never did that. I am giving you 2 stars because of bad german, bad explanation etc. As I pointed out. I give you one star because you, in my eyes, tried to cheat and get more wins then you should have gotten, if any at all.
step by step solution, and not proper german
I would be ore than happy to insert a German calculator but I couldn't
find it so I stuck with the English one. I'm ok to be penalized for
this.
But. Why not write the solution directly in the explanation? Like every
other good quiz does? If you would have written the step by step way in
there and then link somewhere else, I would have been fine with it.
> I have to add one more thing about the "you split the quiz, this is
not valid" in the @contests group someone asked if we could split the
test in multiple ones and an admin responded to use our brains.
Two points: The admins in this group are not judges or have anything at
all to do with this contest. In fact, let me, an admin in this group,
right now write that you should use your brains:
https://t.me/contests/101591. Tada.
Secondly, I dont think you got the message, because if you would have
used your brain, you could have gotten to the conclusion that splitting a
quiz is indeed unfair to other participants. As I hopefully made clear
by now.
*drops mic*