General Medicine Test
English
Intermediate
Welcome to the general medicine test! Carried out by medical students who are currently in their second and third year, from different countries in Latin America. This questionnaire was created with the intention of helping, supporting, reinforcing, encouraging, teaching students and applicants from different careers in the area of health and contains thirty (30) single-choice questions. If you liked you can complete a test of 50 different questions! t.me/QuizBot?start=lijwHnMA or 100 questions test! t.me/QuizBot?start=igowWi6o If you want to keep informed about test updates you can join our group @MedicinaGeneral GOOD LUCK!
Description
Intermedium, Medicine, Medical Health, Medicine test, General medicine test, General, Heart, Neoplasm, Bone, Lymphatic, Health, Medicine degree, Medicine course, Simple selection, Unique selection, First year of medicine, Second year of Medicine, Third year of Medicine, 2nd year of medicine, 1st year of medicine, 3rd year of medicine, 4th year of Medicine, Medicine for all, Physician
Tags
30
Questions
1 min
Per question
5:42
Average time
4.0
Contest Score
4.3
Community Rating
35
Participants
Unfortunately, this test will not be able to receive a prize:
Not an original test. Questions, answers, explanations were copied from an existing test. E.g.
#q16 - http://peb.mp.gov.in/Model%20Answers/YEAR_2018/MST_2018/Client%204/26th%20Feb%20Client4%20Shift1/MSTET_26th%20Feb%20_Shift1_EU.pdf
#q19 -https://www.proprofs.com/discuss/q/389546/which-of-the-following-is-not-fatsoluble-vitamin-
1.- The medical terms do not usually vary since they are exact and universal terms of medicine, from which we cannot add additional information since this would lead to confusion or misunderstanding.
2.- It is noteworthy that the judge has presented some links in a language different from
our native language, this makes it difficult for us to compare both tests, but it is one more example that the medical terms are exact and universal, with this we do not mean that we have copied the test, on the contrary, with this we want to demonstrate that the question presented by the judge and our question are terms of medicine that do not vary, but the way of writing the explanation does vary, where it is noteworthy that our information supports the question different from that provided by the judge. E.g:
#q19 - Link provided by the judge https://www.proprofs.com/discuss/q/389546/which-of-the-following-is-not-fatsoluble-vitamin-
It can be seen that in this screenshot the question has no explanation: https://anonfiles.com/92g5E0E9o7/Captura_de_pantalla_de_2020-07-07_19-42-07_png
Herewith the notable difference of explanation and wording of our test with respect to
this question selected by the judge: https://anonfiles.com/haG7D0Edof/photo_2020-07-07_20-15-34_jpg
#q16- It can be seen that the question is closed (in this case the answer must also be closed or specific due to what was explained in previous points), howeve, the answers only coincide in the right answer "Patella", in addition to this we would like to highlight that in the test presented by the judge, there is a context or pre-description regarding the question, context or pre-description that we have not used in our general medicine test at any time, and we also add that the explanation given by us is clearly a different wording.
Screenshot of the link provided by the judge: https://anonfiles.com/98a3E6Eco4/photo_2020-07-07_21-02-26_jpg
Herewith, capture link on the item of our test where it is appreciable the context used is totally different in terms of answers and explanation: https://anonfiles.com/j9G9D8E7o7/photo_2020-07-07_20-15-39_jpg
Extra: We would like to share the draft or the material used for the creation of our
test, in which it does not violate any condition since it is 100% our information, I do not know if sharing this draft in the comment could violate any contest law since it would contain the 100% of the answers of the test, but we are open to share it if necessary in the correction of the decision made by the judge.
Again, cordial greetings and we hope not to violate any law or conditions of telegram or the contest, we look forward to a second review and that our appeal is taken in the best possible way.
The original verdict was incorrect.
This test may have a higher chance of receiving a reward. Nominated for:
Educational explanations. 👍 Explanations cover why the correct answers are correct and why the wrong answers are wrong (when appropriate). E.g.: #q3, #q4 , #q5, #q6, #q8, #q9, etc.
1.- The medical terms do not usually vary since they are exact and universal terms of medicine, from which we cannot add additional information since this would lead to confusion or misunderstanding.
2.- It is noteworthy that the judge has presented some links in a language different from
our native language, this makes it difficult for us to compare both tests, but it is one more example that the medical terms are exact and universal, with this we do not mean that we have copied the test, on the contrary, with this we want to demonstrate that the question presented by the judge and our question are terms of medicine that do not vary, but the way of writing the explanation does vary, where it is noteworthy that our information supports the question different from that provided by the judge. E.g:
#q19 - Link provided by the judge https://www.proprofs.com/discuss/q/389546/which-of-the-following-is-not-fatsoluble-vitamin-
It can be seen that in this screenshot the question has no explanation: https://anonfiles.com/92g5E0E9o7/Captura_de_pantalla_de_2020-07-07_19-42-07_png
Herewith the notable difference of explanation and wording of our test with respect to
this question selected by the judge: https://anonfiles.com/haG7D0Edof/photo_2020-07-07_20-15-34_jpg
#q16- It can be seen that the question is closed (in this case the answer must also be closed or specific due to what was explained in previous points), howeve, the answers only coincide in the right answer "Patella", in addition to this we would like to highlight that in the test presented by the judge, there is a context or pre-description regarding the question, context or pre-description that we have not used in our general medicine test at any time, and we also add that the explanation given by us is clearly a different wording.
Screenshot of the link provided by the judge: https://anonfiles.com/98a3E6Eco4/photo_2020-07-07_21-02-26_jpg
Herewith, capture link on the item of our test where it is appreciable the context used is totally different in terms of answers and explanation: https://anonfiles.com/j9G9D8E7o7/photo_2020-07-07_20-15-39_jpg
Extra: We would like to share the draft or the material used for the creation of our
test, in which it does not violate any condition since it is 100% our information, I do not know if sharing this draft in the comment could violate any contest law since it would contain the 100% of the answers of the test, but we are open to share it if necessary in the correction of the decision made by the judge.
Again, cordial greetings and we hope not to violate any law or conditions of telegram or the contest, we look forward to a second review and that our appeal is taken in the best possible way.